Skip to main content

January 24: James or Christie?

I don’t want to make a choice here. I only want to explore the differences.

P.D. James wrote from the perspective of a career in health care administration and UK bureaucracies, as well as Parliament. She was not as prolific as Christie in terms of books.

Agatha wrote from her experience in WWI as a nurse working in a pharmacy. Poisons proliferate in her stories.

PD brings us a wider range of people in English society, and more recently—1960s through 1990s. They are less stock and are more likely to be three dimensional. Especially her main detective, Adam Dalgliesh. He is a poet, brooding at times yet fair and egalitarian, resolute to find the murderer but compassionate. She tends to have a formula of three murders, sometimes four, occurring in each book.

Some of Agatha’s stories are 100 years old, and in their originals some racist material can be spotted. It seems that she fixed her sights on the gentry class in English, which was declining. So many of her stories have to do with people killing for inheritances they are waiting on in penury, leading me to think, “Why don’t these people just go get jobs and support themselves rather than waiting on Aunt Gertrude to die or get murdered conveniently?”

Baroness James took more of philosophical and social commentary stance, as her futuristic novel The Children of Men shows.

Both women had sad first marriages. Agatha’s husband cheated on her and left her. Phyllis James husband suffered from mental illness after World War II and died early.

I was happy to find the recent Dalgliesh series, although after Season 1 I have to pay for it. Well, they say there is a free trial, but I am very allergic to free trials of media.

I am sure Agatha’s descendants have enjoyed far more royalty money than P.D.’s.

All that says, as a writer I prefer James, but Agatha has a bigger range and following. It seems an oxymoron to say we are blessed with both of these talented tellers of tales about murder. Blessed, maybe not, but we definitely enjoy them.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

January 26, 2025: Joseph Campbell's view of things

  A colleague sent me this quote the other day. He said that it had really helped him through life and as he faced changes and retirement, and it also helped him follow his bliss and find what he really wanted to do.  “The problem in middle life, when the body has reached its climax of power and begins to decline, is to identify yourself, not with the body, which is falling away, but with the consciousness of which it is a vehicle. This is something I learned from myths. What am I? Am I the bulb that carries the light? Or am I the light of which the bulb is a vehicle? One of the psychological problems in growing old is the fear of death. People resist the door of death. But this body is a vehicle of consciousness, and if you can identify with the consciousness, you can watch this body go like an old car. There goes the fender, there goes the tire, one thing after another— but it’s predictable. And then, gradually, the whole thing drops off, and consciousness rejoins consciousn...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why to Read Fiction, Idea #27: Empathy, anyone?

The Idea #27 is tongue in cheek.  But these are some ideas about writing fiction, which I have done in ten novels (and counting), a dozen short stories, and two produced plays (I know, not exactly the same).  Background: In 2015 a colleague and I wrote an open educational resource public speaking textbook for a grant provided by our University System. We didn't realize at the time that it would go viral and be used all over the world within a few years. There are two reasons for that: it is good (as good as anything on the market) and it is free, although only in digital form. Check out www.exploringpublicspeaking.com for it. We also didn't know at the time that my co-author would die at 39 in 2016. I still miss him. Back to the point, I receive requests for the test banks every other day, and this morning I received one from Pennsylvania. The writer had a signature line: "Reading fiction is important. It is a vital means of imagining a life other than our own, which in t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thoughtful.....

Corran Addison July 9, 2018    ·  The best, most cogent and elegantly simple explanation into the inexplicably destructive negotiating processes of the president,by Prof. David Honig of Indiana University. Everybody I know should read this accurate and enlightening piece... “I’m going to get a little wonky and write about Donald Trump and negotiations. For those who don't know, I'm an adjunct professor at Indiana University - Robert H. McKinney School of Law and I teach negotiations. Okay, here goes. Trump, as most of us know, is the credited author of "The Art of the Deal," a book that was actually ghost written by a man named Tony Schwartz, who was given access to Trump and wrote based upon his observations. If you've read The Art of the Deal, or if you've followed Trump lately, you'll know, even if you didn't know the label, that he sees all dealmaking as what we call "distributive bargaining." Distributive bargaining always has a winner a...
Post a Comment
Read more