Skip to main content

Coming back!

 I've been a poor excuse for a blogger lately. Some catch up:

Wonderful essay on grieving: https://thedispatch.com/newsletter/dispatch-faith/the-grace-of-grief/

Please be aware of my podcast: It's too good to have the few number of listens it has. It's not good because of me, but because of who I get for guests.  They astound me.  You can get it on Apple and Spotify or at https://rss.com/podcasts/dialogues-with-creators/  Dialogues with Creators. Also on YouTube but it may be hard to find unless you add the guest, and it's just audio anyway. 

I am doing a LOT of study of AI, especially generative. I am not a Luddite, but I am staying as far away from this phenomenon as I can.  No thank you to the Google AI Overview! Will AI kill us by making itself too smart, or by making ourselves too stupid?  That seems to be the question!  Until AI has a physical body, it's going to be limited--but there is always robotics.  Maybe we should get AI to write a novel about AI taking over; I'm sure that is not original, though. 

Listening to a discussion between Jonah Goldberg (who can be a kind of a jerk, but I think he knows that) and Chris Stirewalt (whom I'd like to meet) on Democracy. They recommended Calvin Coolidge's address on the 150th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence.  https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-the-celebration-the-150th-anniversary-the-declaration-independence-philadelphia

I have just read this speech, and several things strike me. One, what politician today (definitely not our current president) would give this well-researched and well-reasoned a speech? Who has the nerve to attribute our material prosperity to the spiritual truths of the founding documents and the faith of the early Americans rather than to our hard work and "the American Dream?" (What the hooey is that, anyway?)  Who is so perspicacious as to say, "Look backward for the answers, rather than coming up with some new -ism?"  Who has the hutzpah to say this:

No other theory is adequate to explain or comprehend the Declaration of Independence. It is the product of the spiritual insight of the people. We live in an age of science and of abounding accumulation of material things. These did not create our Declaration. Our Declaration created them. The things of the spirit come first. Unless we cling to that, all our material prosperity, overwhelming though it may appear, will turn to a barren scepter in our grasp. If we are to maintain the great heritage which has been bequeathed to us, we must be like-minded as the fathers who created it. We must not sink into a pagan materialism. We must cultivate the reverence which they had for the things that are holy. We must follow the spiritual and moral leadership which they showed. We must keep replenished, that they may glow with a more compelling flame, the altar fires before which they worshiped.

Chris said something along the lines of an old "joke" by English teachers. "This paper is both good and original. What is original is not good and what is good is not original." He said, "An idea can be both popular and good. What is good is not going to be popular and what is popular is not going to be good." His point was that we have a republic based on a constitution where leaders are chosen by democratic processes, not a pure democracy, and pure populism is not the way it is supposed to be. I am good with that. 

Also on this podcast, Jonah said something profound, as he often does: The immigrants of the past did not push education on their children as a way of getting rich, but as a hedge against poverty. That is definitely how we should see it in economic terms; there are other spiritual, social, intellectual, cultural, and familial benefits from education that will not make one financial rich but humanly and humanely wealthy. 

I am off to visit family this week. I look forward to some crabmeat--that will give you an idea where I am going!


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

January 26, 2025: Joseph Campbell's view of things

  A colleague sent me this quote the other day. He said that it had really helped him through life and as he faced changes and retirement, and it also helped him follow his bliss and find what he really wanted to do.  “The problem in middle life, when the body has reached its climax of power and begins to decline, is to identify yourself, not with the body, which is falling away, but with the consciousness of which it is a vehicle. This is something I learned from myths. What am I? Am I the bulb that carries the light? Or am I the light of which the bulb is a vehicle? One of the psychological problems in growing old is the fear of death. People resist the door of death. But this body is a vehicle of consciousness, and if you can identify with the consciousness, you can watch this body go like an old car. There goes the fender, there goes the tire, one thing after another— but it’s predictable. And then, gradually, the whole thing drops off, and consciousness rejoins consciousn...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why to Read Fiction, Idea #27: Empathy, anyone?

The Idea #27 is tongue in cheek.  But these are some ideas about writing fiction, which I have done in ten novels (and counting), a dozen short stories, and two produced plays (I know, not exactly the same).  Background: In 2015 a colleague and I wrote an open educational resource public speaking textbook for a grant provided by our University System. We didn't realize at the time that it would go viral and be used all over the world within a few years. There are two reasons for that: it is good (as good as anything on the market) and it is free, although only in digital form. Check out www.exploringpublicspeaking.com for it. We also didn't know at the time that my co-author would die at 39 in 2016. I still miss him. Back to the point, I receive requests for the test banks every other day, and this morning I received one from Pennsylvania. The writer had a signature line: "Reading fiction is important. It is a vital means of imagining a life other than our own, which in t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Birdwatching

 Whose world is this, anyway? My husband came out to the deck where I was reading, thinking, and taking long pauses to listen to birds and watch them visit the feeders. Nala and Butter were keeping the the squirrels away. The cardinals, like kings, were making sure they were fed first but wrens, sparrows, finches, robins, swifts sat in the trees calling and cackling. My Cornell Labs app has identified 18 in 18 minutes, some new ones included. “How interesting that God made all the birds have distinctive calls,” I said. “But I guess they are calling to their own kind, their mate and children.” “Do you think they are talking to each other?” he said. “Not like we do, no communicating, but signaling.” “I thought they were singing for us.” We laughed about that; our human-centric, self-centered view of things takes over. “They sing and make noises when we are not here, so it’s not for us. If they are singing for anyone, it’s God.” I had read Samuel’s speech to the nation in I Samuel 12,...
Post a Comment
Read more