Skip to main content

Speculative Fiction: Astounding, Severance, and Pluribus

 This may be a three-parter. I am fascinated by speculative fiction of a certain type. I would call it Twilight Zone-based. I love the Twilight Zone when I was a child and it imprinted on me. I have not watched many of the episodes now on YouTube, but I remember many of them. The basic aesthetic of a normal person all of the sudden caught in a nightmare world has a lot of possibilities. I have written some short fiction of that ilk myself. One day I need to collect them and self-publish them. I do not want to send stories to contests (costs) or to magazines. People can read them if they want. Perhaps I will start to post them here. 

Anyway, "speculative fiction," according to the all-knowing Wikipedia, citing the Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Literature, is

an umbrella genre of fiction that encompasses all the subgenres that depart from realism, or strictly imitating everyday reality, instead presenting fantasticalsupernaturalfuturistic, or other highly imaginative realms or beings.

Actually, the source says:

a super category for all genres that deliberately depart from imitating "consensus reality" of everyday experience. In this latter sense, speculative fiction includes fantasy, science fiction, and horror, but also their derivatives, hybrids, and cognate genres like the gothic, dystopia, weird fiction, post-apocalyptic fiction, ghost stories, superhero tales, alternate history, steampunk, slipstream, magic realism, fractured fairy tales, and more.

Science fiction is about futuristic and technologically advanced (or different) settings. I like it and consider it rich for study, which is why I bought and read all of this book by Alec Nevala-Lee:

Astounding: John W. Campbell, Isaac Asimov, Robert A. Heinlein, L. Ron Hubbard, and the Golden Age of Science Fiction


Yes, that L. Ron Hubbard; the book explains his connection to the pulp fiction magazine Astounding and science fiction writing and how it led to his "diagnosing" people and cleaning out their memories, or some such. It led me to read some other stories I did not know, like "Nightfall" and "Who Goes There?", which was the basis of The Thing, a classic in the science fiction movie genre. 

I enjoyed Astounding and felt quite informed about the genre. However, its focus was that futuristic or other planet/solar system and/or technologically advanced world of classic science fiction. I watched the first three episodes of Andor recently (because it was free on YouTube; I'm not sure I can hook up with some free Disney Plus). It is a Star Wars-world-related story with none of the Star Wars hokum. It deserves its reputation and I hope I can find the rest of it somewhere. Yes, I like "space stories" as long as they are more focused on story than the morals and preaching at our current human state. That was always a fault of Star Trek to me. 

However, the type of speculative fiction I enjoy is not so much space-oriented as "human in a new unexplained" world and that brings me to Severance and Pluribus. 

I have my issues with these shows. First, the long pauses between "seasons." Who knows when we will see the next season of Severance, and will I care by then? Maybe not! Same with Plur1bus (note the spelling, by the way). Second, I can only watch them because I have Apple TV, so they aren't available to many people. That may or may not be such a deal. Third, they really inspire a lot of explanatory videos on YouTube. I for one fell into that deep well and have been able to escape it. The makers of the video seem to have access to a limited number of clips from the shows that they play over and over again. These YouTubers do have insights into the show for a few reasons. In the case of Plur1bus, they were or are fans of Vince Gilligan's other shows. Having never watched those, I come to Plur1bus with no preconceptions. I don't like it because of the director's previous work; I don't compare it, either. Plur1bus is what it is. 

Both shows have to have their gay-themed sub-plots; that is a requisite nowadays, and they have a lot of foul language, so if you aren't interested in either of those traits, I don't recommend them. A friend of mine finished an MFA program at a large university and came up against the LGBTQ issue. His professors wanted more of that but he had no connection to it. He was more or less told it would keep him back from success. Sigh. I can't write about that subject honestly, so I don't. Being a famous writer is less important than my integrity, and I have enough trouble maintaining integrity as it is. 

Beyond that, both shows are intriguing and addictive but are only science fiction in a tangential way. In Severance, the characters who are severed (more on that later) have a chip or some such implanted in their brains, by choice, to keep their work and home lives separate. In Plur1bus, all but thirteen humans on earth are infected by a virus broadcast from space; not the actual virus, but the data for it and for some reason the scientific community recreates it. Lab leak theory takes over; a rat infected with the virus escapes and bites a scientist, and that's (almost) the end. In a matter of days the world is infected either by saliva or by the virus being sprayed by humans who are infected. 

In both cases, then, the "science-fictiony situation" is partly by choice! 

More on this later!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why to Read Fiction, Idea #27: Empathy, anyone?

The Idea #27 is tongue in cheek.  But these are some ideas about writing fiction, which I have done in ten novels (and counting), a dozen short stories, and two produced plays (I know, not exactly the same).  Background: In 2015 a colleague and I wrote an open educational resource public speaking textbook for a grant provided by our University System. We didn't realize at the time that it would go viral and be used all over the world within a few years. There are two reasons for that: it is good (as good as anything on the market) and it is free, although only in digital form. Check out www.exploringpublicspeaking.com for it. We also didn't know at the time that my co-author would die at 39 in 2016. I still miss him. Back to the point, I receive requests for the test banks every other day, and this morning I received one from Pennsylvania. The writer had a signature line: "Reading fiction is important. It is a vital means of imagining a life other than our own, which in t...

Keeping Up Appearances? David's Surprise Anointing to Be King

  Have you ever watched the show, Keeping Up Appearances? What it is. A comedy about a British woman who wants to be thought of as very high class even though her family is low class. Her name is Hyacinth Bucket but she pronounces it Bouquet. She wants everything perfect but her family works against her, and her neighbors run from her. We all know someone who wants to keep up appearances, and sometimes we do. In our everyday life, we depend on our eyes and we automatically trust them, at least at first, and we often don’t look closely or below the surface. Like puzzles. But we know that appearances can be deceiving, even though they catch us. So I wanted to show this video I saw recently because it’s disturbing but informative. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FERa1AI2EK8 AI has gotten far better on making these deep fakes—videos that are not of anyone but totally generated by the software. Even though they look like someone, they are not. Of course, it is stealing fro...

Birdwatching

 Whose world is this, anyway? My husband came out to the deck where I was reading, thinking, and taking long pauses to listen to birds and watch them visit the feeders. Nala and Butter were keeping the the squirrels away. The cardinals, like kings, were making sure they were fed first but wrens, sparrows, finches, robins, swifts sat in the trees calling and cackling. My Cornell Labs app has identified 18 in 18 minutes, some new ones included. “How interesting that God made all the birds have distinctive calls,” I said. “But I guess they are calling to their own kind, their mate and children.” “Do you think they are talking to each other?” he said. “Not like we do, no communicating, but signaling.” “I thought they were singing for us.” We laughed about that; our human-centric, self-centered view of things takes over. “They sing and make noises when we are not here, so it’s not for us. If they are singing for anyone, it’s God.” I had read Samuel’s speech to the nation in I Samuel 12,...