Skip to main content

Tullian Tchividjian weighs in on Philip Yancey

He posted this on Facebook, so I figure it's fair game to post here. This writer is Billy Graham's ex-son-in-law, and as he mentions here, also committed adultery, which he owns.

I appreciate his words, but I still find the hypocrisy of Yancey speaking and writing while being in the affair to be . . . I can't say unforgivable, but disqualifying. Why didn't he believe what he wrote? Did he write to convince himself, or just to make money? I'm a cynic, I suppose. I've seen too much of this in my life.

Addendum: I am glad to see Tchividjian being called out for this post. Others perceive it to be "too soft on sin," especially the comment we are all three days away from an affair. Ed Stetzer's editorial is better--it gives godly advice on preventing sinful patterns. TT's comments seem to say we don't know ourselves well enough and that's why we judge PY. This is very close to an "everyone is doing it" argument or "everyone is about to do it" one. There are some other fallacies in his piece. He deserved the criticism I saw.

I am still wondering how Yancey kept this a secret from his wife all that time. Was she detached from him, or was he traveling a lot, or did he just lie about where he was? Astounding.

Did he write so much about grace for himself or for others? And why did he have to confess it publicly? Why did we have to know. Just go away. Stop writing. Stop bothering us.

Some, mostly women, state pretty unequivocally that this is a life-long pattern and didn't start at 67 years of age. I see their point.

A woman at my church says, repeatedly, that stealing a piece of bubble gum is sin just like murder. Well, yes, and no. Mostly no. If I as an adult go to a pharmacy and steal a pack of gum and try to walk out with it (and will probably get buzzed at the door), sure, that's stupid and wrong. I did wrong. But there is no comparison of that to murder. Consequences are part of the sin act.

Yancey's act had bigger consequences.

Yet, we all have to fall back on grace.

____________
Tchividjian's words:

Philip Yancey, one of the most influential Christian writers of the last fifty years, has confessed to an eight-year affair. He is 76 years old.
For those unfamiliar with his work, Yancey authored award-winning books like “What’s So Amazing About Grace”, “Disappointment with God”, and “The Jesus I Never Knew”. His writing gave countless people permission to wrestle honestly with faith, doubt, suffering, and grace. I’ve long admired him. His books shaped me. And none of this changes any of that.
The news is, of course, heartbreaking. News like this always re-breaks my heart and sends shivers down my spine, because it pulls me back into the devastation I caused by my own infidelity—the wreckage, the shockwaves, the lives of those I love altered in ways that never fully return to “before.”
An affair is not an abstract moral failure. It is a long obedience in deception, and it leaves wreckage in its wake. Trust me, I know. Real people, especially those closest, carry the weight of betrayal, disorientation, grief, and a loss of trust that words alone cannot repair. Any talk of grace that does not first make room for that devastation is not grace at all; it’s evasion. For those affected, it’s understandable that hearing about grace in any form might feel like an allergen right now, a bitter reminder that feels premature or even painful.
What shocks me most, however, isn’t Philip’s sin. It’s the way Christian subculture routinely reacts when broken people break things.
Disappointment? Yes. Sadness? Absolutely. Feeling gut-punched? Of course. But shock? That’s the tell.
Shock almost always signals that Christian subculture is still operating with a high anthropology rather than a low one. We say we believe in the depth of human brokenness, but we rarely believe it applies to the people we admire most. We expect sin in theory, just not in our heroes.
Somewhere along the way, we’ve come to believe there is a fundamental difference between certain people and the rest of us—that some are less broken, less fragile, less capable of failure. But while there are functional differences between roles, statuses, and responsibilities, there is no fundamental difference at the level of human nature. The idea that some people don’t struggle with the same fears, temptations, and contradictions as everyone else is a myth. Human beings are human beings, carrying the same flaws, anxieties, and sinful tendencies across the board. No one lives outside the bounds of reality or human nature.
I have a friend who once said that all of us are three bad days away from becoming a tabloid headline and most of us are already on day two. All have fallen short, across every culture, vocation, ideology, and persuasion under the sun. Sin is a shared, ever-present reality, something that clings to all of us. All of us.
So if our theology leaves us stunned by human failure, it may be worth asking whether we’ve quietly believed in ourselves more than we realized.

What’s so amazing about grace? It covers both the sin of adultery and the sin of the one who looks down on the adulterer. It doesn’t excuse the devastation. It doesn’t bypass the wounded. It doesn’t ask whether one fall is worse than another. Grace simply shows up where it is needed most—over the wreckage, over the betrayal, over us all. #philipyancey 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why to Read Fiction, Idea #27: Empathy, anyone?

The Idea #27 is tongue in cheek.  But these are some ideas about writing fiction, which I have done in ten novels (and counting), a dozen short stories, and two produced plays (I know, not exactly the same).  Background: In 2015 a colleague and I wrote an open educational resource public speaking textbook for a grant provided by our University System. We didn't realize at the time that it would go viral and be used all over the world within a few years. There are two reasons for that: it is good (as good as anything on the market) and it is free, although only in digital form. Check out www.exploringpublicspeaking.com for it. We also didn't know at the time that my co-author would die at 39 in 2016. I still miss him. Back to the point, I receive requests for the test banks every other day, and this morning I received one from Pennsylvania. The writer had a signature line: "Reading fiction is important. It is a vital means of imagining a life other than our own, which in t...

Books I Have Read Lately

 Retirement means more time to read.  One Blood , by Denene Millner. This book and author won the Townsend Prize for Fiction 2025 and therefore beat me as one of the other nine finalists. She deserved it for her dramatic and exotic style; mine feels pale in comparison. I have to admit, I have timed out on it when I got to the third main character's story. It starts with a Black midwife in 1950s/1960s Virginia, who is imprisoned for not lying on a birth certificate about a "white" baby's racial identity. The baby is clearly part Black, meaning either the family had Black ancestors or the mother had a lover (I'm not entirely sure about that). The midwife's daughter is brutally murdered by her lover and in this chaos, the granddaughter is spirited away to New York in a wooden box. (Why I am not sure--New York makes sense, because a relation lives there, but why she couldn't just be put on a train, I'm not sure. I imagine Black people could ride trains in ...

Keeping Up Appearances? David's Surprise Anointing to Be King

  Have you ever watched the show, Keeping Up Appearances? What it is. A comedy about a British woman who wants to be thought of as very high class even though her family is low class. Her name is Hyacinth Bucket but she pronounces it Bouquet. She wants everything perfect but her family works against her, and her neighbors run from her. We all know someone who wants to keep up appearances, and sometimes we do. In our everyday life, we depend on our eyes and we automatically trust them, at least at first, and we often don’t look closely or below the surface. Like puzzles. But we know that appearances can be deceiving, even though they catch us. So I wanted to show this video I saw recently because it’s disturbing but informative. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FERa1AI2EK8 AI has gotten far better on making these deep fakes—videos that are not of anyone but totally generated by the software. Even though they look like someone, they are not. Of course, it is stealing fro...